<International Circulation>:For you personally， what interests you at this meeting?

  《国际循环》：就您个人来讲，您对本次会议的兴趣所在是什么？

    Prof Crawford: Of course， the percutaneous valve results presented this morning were most interesting to me. I am a general cardiologist and see a lot of patients with valve disease and constantly discussing the options with patients when they have severe aortic stenosis. To see this trial， which was a randomized comparison of surgery versus the percutaneous valve in patients who were high risk but candidates for surgery (not so high a risk that they weren’t surgical candidates)， and its results could potentially change the whole way we practice cardiology. The trial showed that the percutaneous valve was not inferior to surgery at a one year endpoint.

    Crawford教授：无疑的，今天早上提出的经皮瓣膜的成果我最感兴趣，我是一个普通的心脏病专家，接诊过许多的心脏瓣膜病人，并且也不断的探讨重度主动脉瓣狭窄病人治疗的选择。纵观这个实验，它是在高危但只是有相对外科手术指证的病人（风险不是大到一定要进行外科手术）身上采取外科手术和或是经皮<